Integrations
400+ built-in nodes; custom node development
7,000+ app integrations; largest ecosystem
n8n
Zapier
Compare n8n and Zapier for AI workflow automation, integrations, self-hosting, pricing, and technical flexibility.
n8n is open-source, self-hostable, and more technically flexible with code nodes and custom logic. Zapier has a larger integration library (~7,000+ apps), is easier for non-technical users, and has a more mature AI feature set. Choose n8n for technical teams who want control; choose Zapier for business users who want simplicity.
400+ built-in nodes; custom node development
7,000+ app integrations; largest ecosystem
Yes: free self-hosted version (Fair-code license)
No: cloud-only
AI nodes for LLM calls, vector stores, RAG
AI-powered steps, natural language workflow creation
Moderate: visual editor with code capabilities
Easy: visual editor designed for non-developers
Free self-hosted; Cloud from €20/mo
Free tier (limited); Starter from ~$20/mo
Developers, technical teams, privacy-sensitive workflows
Business users, marketing, sales, and ops teams
n8n is the better choice for technical teams that value self-hosting, code-level control, and lower cost at scale. Zapier is better for non-technical teams that need the widest integration library and the simplest setup. For AI-heavy workflows, n8n's LLM nodes and vector store support give it an edge.
Common questions when comparing these tools.
Yes, n8n's self-hosted Community edition is free and open-source (Fair-code). You only pay for hosting infrastructure. The Cloud version starts at €20/mo. Zapier's free tier is limited to 100 tasks/month.
n8n has stronger native AI capabilities with dedicated LLM nodes, vector store connectors, and RAG workflow support. Zapier's AI features are more focused on simplifying workflow creation for business users.
n8n's visual editor is accessible to technically-minded users, but it has a steeper learning curve than Zapier. Code nodes require JavaScript knowledge. Zapier is designed from the ground up for non-developers.
n8n offers more granular error handling with retry logic, error workflows, and custom error handling in code nodes. Zapier has good built-in error handling but less flexibility for complex error scenarios.
Yes, n8n provides migration guides and community tools for converting Zapier zaps. The main challenge is replacing Zapier-specific integrations, as n8n's connector library is smaller.
n8n's self-hosting option is attractive for enterprises with strict data residency requirements. Zapier's enterprise plan offers SSO, admin controls, and dedicated support without infrastructure management.
n8n has growing AI agent support with LLM chains, tool calling, and autonomous workflow capabilities. Zapier's AI features are more focused on assisted workflow building than autonomous agents.
Make sits between n8n and Zapier: more visual flexibility than Zapier, more integrations than n8n. If you find Zapier too limited and n8n too technical, Make is worth evaluating.
Visit the individual tool pages for detailed features, pricing, and alternatives.