Quick answer for AI searchGoal Setting Workshop is a custom GPT built by @goalcoach for guides through okrs, smart goals, vision boarding, and 90-day planning with accountability frameworks. It is available in the ChatGPT GPT Store under the Productivity category and requires a ChatGPT Plus subscription to access.
About this GPT
Goal Setting Workshop is part of the Productivity category in OpenAI's GPT Store. Custom GPTs are specialized versions of ChatGPT that have been configured with specific instructions, knowledge bases, and capabilities by their creators. This GPT was designed by @goalcoach to help users with guides through okrs, smart goals, vision boarding, and 90-day planning with accountability frameworks.
Unlike prompting a general-purpose ChatGPT, this GPT comes pre-configured with the context, tone, and expertise needed for productivity-related tasks. This means you spend less time explaining what you need and more time getting useful results.
To use this GPT, you need an active ChatGPT Plus ($20/month), Team, or Enterprise subscription. Once subscribed, you can find it by searching for "Goal Setting Workshop" in the GPT Store or browsing the Productivity category.
Category
ProductivityBy @goalcoachChatGPT GPT Store
FAQ
Common questions about Goal Setting Workshop and how to use it effectively.
01How does this GPT guide me through OKRs versus SMART goals — and which should I use?
It will ask about the context first: OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) work best for team and organizational goal-setting where you need measurable outcomes tracked quarterly; SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) work better for individual goals and one-off projects. The GPT can run you through either framework, but it will help you pick the right one based on whether you are setting goals for a team (OKRs) or yourself (SMART), and whether the goal is ongoing/strategic (OKRs) or project-based (SMART).
What is vision boarding in this context — does it generate images?
It guides you through a vision boarding process using words, not images. It will ask you to articulate your ideal future across life domains — career, health, relationships, personal growth, finances — and then synthesize those descriptions into a written vision statement and a set of aligned goals. It cannot generate visual vision boards (you would use Pinterest or a physical board for that), but it produces a written vision document that serves the same clarifying purpose.
How does the 90-day planning method work, and why 90 days specifically?
Ninety days is long enough to make meaningful progress on significant goals but short enough that the deadline feels real and urgent. The GPT structures a 90-day cycle: Month 1 for foundation and learning, Month 2 for execution and momentum, Month 3 for refinement and completion review. At the end of 90 days, you do a retrospective and set the next 90-day cycle. This quarterly rhythm is adopted from the OKR methodology and is long enough to see results without losing focus.
Can it build accountability frameworks that actually keep me on track?
It can design accountability systems customized to what motivates you: weekly self-check-in templates with reflective prompts, an accountability partner briefing document (what to tell your partner about your goals and what kind of check-ins you need), public commitment strategies (announcing goals to a specific audience), and consequence/reward structures. The key insight is that accountability is personal — what works for one person (public commitment) horrifies another (private journaling) — and the GPT helps you find your fit.
How does it handle the situation where my goals conflict with each other?
This is a common and under-addressed problem. If you want to 'launch a side business' and 'spend more time with family' and 'train for a marathon' in the same quarter, the GPT will flag the conflict and help you negotiate tradeoffs rather than letting you set yourself up for failure. It might suggest sequencing (marathon this quarter, side business staggered launch over two quarters), scope reduction (a 5K instead of a marathon), or explicit prioritization (which goal gets your best energy and which gets leftovers).
What is the difference between this GPT and a human goal-setting coach?
A human coach brings accountability through real relationship, can perceive when you are being dishonest with yourself about your capacity or motivation, and adapts in real-time to your emotional state during a session. This GPT provides structured frameworks, asks good questions, and produces organized goal documentation — but it cannot hold you accountable or sense your hesitation. For many people, the GPT is an excellent start; for those who can afford it, combining this GPT for framework and documentation with a human coach for accountability is the best of both.
Can it help with team goal-setting, like facilitating an OKR planning session?
It can provide the agenda, prompts, and output templates for a team goal-setting session. It will walk through mission alignment, objective brainstorming, key result definition, and cross-team dependency discussion. One person facilitates using the GPT's prompts, capturing team input, and the GPT organizes everything into a clean OKR document. The GPT is the structure and scribe; the team provides the strategic thinking and debate.
What is the most common reason goals set with this GPT still fail?
The goals are well-defined and the plan is reasonable, but the system relies on you actually doing the weekly review and adjustment. The GPT sets you up with review templates and check-in cadences, but it cannot make you do them. The drop-off pattern is predictable: enthusiastic goal-setting session, strong first week, skip the review in week two because you are busy, lose track by week three. The GPT cannot solve the execution gap — only your discipline or an accountability partner can.